|
The Ohio District offers these pages of its website for personal perspectives on faith and life in today's world. We hope to offer visitors to our site thought-provoking insights, questions and encouragements that will draw them more deeply into study of the Scriptures, prayer, and reflection.
We want this to be an interactive process where readers offer their comments and reflections on the ideas offered by our bloggers (You must be a registered user of our site to take advantage of this feature). Our prayer is that these conversations will in small (and perhaps large) ways help us make the light of Christ shine more brightly in our homes, congregations and communities.
We have created a page for guest bloggers. If you have an essay of up to 300 words that you feel would help up accomplish the goals outlined above, please submit it by email to our website adminsitrator.
The Ohio District offers these pages of its website for personal perspectives on faith and life in today's world. We hope to offer visitors to our site thought-provoking insights, questions and encouragements that will draw them more deeply into study of the Scriptures, prayer, and reflection.
We want this to be an interactive process where readers offer their comments and reflections on the ideas offered by our bloggers (You must be a registered user of our site to take advantage of this feature). Our prayer is that these conversations will in small (and perhaps large) ways help us make the light of Christ shine more brightly in our homes, congregations and communities.
We have created a page for guest bloggers. If you have an essay of up to 300 words that you feel would help up accomplish the goals outlined above, please submit it by email to our website adminsitrator.
 |
 |
|
|
Blogs
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Notes on an old Bulletin Cover - Passionless Preachers
Friday, January 02, 2009 :: 450 Views :: 1 Comments ::  :: 
There's a well-meaning but unfortunate style some seminarians have been taught lately. I've heard it discussed with alarm among some of our pastors and it leaves us exasperated. The proponents of this style say that the preacher should not intrude with emotion or inflection upon the Scripture lessons that are read or upon the sermon that is preached. Just let God's Word do the work without any help from the preacher's tone or inflection. “We want the hearers to believe because of the Word itself, not on account of the pastor's sermonic skills.” I have no idea where this idea originated. I have no idea what professor or professors teach this, nor do I want to know. Maybe they don't teach it deliberately but it arose through miscommunication. No matter. It is enough to correct the error itself.
There's a well-meaning but unfortunate style some seminarians have been taught lately. I've heard it discussed with alarm among some of our pastors and it leaves us exasperated. The proponents of this style say that the preacher should not intrude with emotion or inflection upon the Scripture lessons that are read or upon the sermon that is preached. Just let God's Word do the work without any help from the preacher's tone or inflection. “We want the hearers to believe because of the Word itself, not on account of the pastor's sermonic skills.” I have no idea where this idea originated. I have no idea what professor or professors teach this, nor do I want to know. Maybe they don't teach it deliberately but it arose through miscommunication. No matter. It is enough to correct the error itself.
To be charitable, such proponents are confusing emotionalism with emotion. While no one wants to see teary-eyed Jimmy Swaggarts manipulating their audiences from the pulpit, neither do we want to hear a spiritless voice that sounds like it came from a Garmin or Tom-Tom GPS. By speaking in such a monotone, the preacher may be avoiding emotionalism, but he is communicating complete boredom and disinterest. And when he reads the lessons in that same spiritless monotone, he is failing to do his job. Interpretation is part of the preacher's task. If any dare read John's scathing words, “who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?” or Jesus', “Woe to you scribes and pharisees,” or Paul's, “I am astonished that you have so quickly deserted the Gospel” as though reading a list of ingredients on a carton of ice cream, he is miscommunicating and certainly misinterpreting the Word of Life. If the mob cried, “Crucify, crucify” with as little conviction as is conveyed by these preachers, one would have to wonder why Pilate listened to them at all! Now I'm not advocating that the reading of the lessons becomes a reader's theater of sorts, but the way some read, one would have a hard time trying to convince people that this is the greatest story every told.
As for the notion of “getting out of the way” and letting the Word work without any human help, one ought to test that notion very carefully. For when one examines the form and structure of St Paul's letters, he finds more than one nod to the rhetorician's style. Unless we make St Paul a two-face, employing these rhetorical devices did not seem to him to be among those “cunning” and “underhanded” ways of presenting the Gospel which he claimed to have rejected. These things were not manipulations. They were flourishes that were treats to the ear and helped drive home the points which he wished to make.
To look at it from another perspective, do you understand why the Scriptures encourage believers to both Word and deed? If a shameful life can bring discredit on the Gospel, surely a flat, emotionless style can impact the proclaimed Word negatively as well. Read the Scriptures publicly in a way that interprets what is written. Preach the Gospel with honest conviction. God will be glorified.
Rating:
Only registered users may post comments.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|